Community Forum Regarding the Future of the Park Hill Golf Course Land
A HISTORY OF THE PARK HILL GOLF COURSE
1982 – The Colorado Attorney General’s Office files a lawsuit to remove the City and County of Denver as the Trustee of the George W. Clayton Trust for the City’s alleged self-dealing with the Trust’s assets, including the Park Hill Golf Course. The City resigns as the Trustee and University of Denver Chancellor Chester Alter is named as interim Trustee.
1984 – The Clayton Foundation is created and becomes the permanent Trustee of the George W. Clayton Trust. The Clayton Foundation is governed by a volunteer Board of Trustees.
1986 — The Clayton Foundation hires a real estate firm to market the Park Hill Golf Course property for sale. In November of 1986, Clayton enters into an agreement to sell the property to L.C. Fulenwider, Inc. for $10.6 million. Fulenwider’s purchase of the property is contingent upon the successful rezoning of the property for a mixed-use development that includes retail and light-industrial uses.
1988 — As a result of the economic and real estate downturn in Denver during the late 1980’s and resistance to the rezoning from surrounding neighborhood groups such as Greater Park Hill, North Park Hill and City Park North, L.C. Fulenwider terminates the purchase and sale agreement in 1988. Rather than remarket the property for sale in an unsupportive economic and political environment, Clayton’s Board of Trustees decides to hold the property and renegotiate the golf lease to increase the rental payment to a “market” rate.
1989 — In an effort to save the Park Hill Golf Course from development once the market improved, then Denver City Councilperson Cathy Reynolds includes a line item in the City’s $300 million Bond Referendum that earmarked “$2 million towards the purchase of the Park Hill Golf Course.” Councilperson Reynolds was an avid golfer who played regularly at the Park Hill Golf Course. The $300 million Bond Referendum passes.
1994 — Mayor Wellington Webb’s director of special projects, Andrew Wallach, approaches Clayton about the $2 million earmarked for the course. He asks whether Clayton would grant the City a perpetual Conservation Easement on the course in exchange for the $2 million. The Conservation Easement would allow Clayton to continue to operate the property as a golf course or open space, but would preclude development of the property.
To determine if the $2 million was sufficient compensation for the potential development rights it would be giving up, Clayton goes through an appraisal process and the appraiser concludes that the value of the property as a golf course is $6 million and the value under a highest and best use scenario is $8 million. Essentially, the appraiser concludes that the value of the potential development rights at that time was $2 million.
1997 — Based upon that conclusion, Clayton grants a perpetual Conservation Easement on the golf course property to the City and County of Denver in exchange for payment from the City of $2 million. The perpetual Conservation Easement limits the use of the property to open space in general and a golf course in particular.
1998 – Clayton issues a request for proposal to prospective lessees of the course, including American Golf Corporation and Arnold Palmer Golf. In late 1998, Clayton enters into the current 20-year lease with American Golf Corporation. AGC agreed to pay Clayton $500,000 in year one, $550,000 in year two, $650,000 in year three and $700,000 in years four through 20.
2000 – The Office of the Assessor for the City and County of Denver informs Clayton that even though the owner of the course, The George W. Clayton Trust, is a tax-exempt entity, the lessee of the course is not. As a result, American Golf Corporation is subject to a Possessory Interest Tax. Because American Golf entered into the Lease with the understanding that the property was tax-exempt and that Clayton would be responsible for any real estate taxes, Clayton would be required to reimburse American Golf for the Possessory Interest Tax. This was a significant unforeseen expense to Clayton.
To address this unforeseen expense, Clayton submits a proposal to the City whereby the City would release the Conservation Easement, Clayton would convey fee simple title to the City but would retain control of the beneficial use of the property under an Agency Agreement similar to the one that was in place at the time in Winter Park. Because the City would hold legal title to the property, the property would once again be tax exempt.
Clayton and the City enter into the Agreement provided that Clayton may terminate the Agency Agreement at any time and the City would convey legal title back to Clayton. If that occurs, however, the Agency Agreement requires that the Conservation Easement must be put back in place and the lessee would once again become subject to the Possessory Interest Tax.
2008 – American Golf Corporation assigns the lease to EAGLE Golf.
2015 – Clayton Early Learning contracts appraisal of Golf Course
2015 – EAGLE Golf assigns the lease to Arcis Golf. The lease expires at the end of 2018.
2017 – Inter-Neighborhood Parks and Rec Committee brings forward a resolution to support Denver purchasing the Golf Course with GO-Bonds. The INC Delegation approves.
2017- Denver and Clayton Early Learning announce sale of Golf Course
Clayton and the City release the Contract The proposed deal, which would require the approval of the Denver City Council, would have Denver pay $20.5 million over the course of 30 years for the property. The complicated proposed contract between Denver and Clayton that, among other things, would divide the 155 acres of Park Hill Golf Course into 2 parcels – 50% of the property that would be sold in fee title directly to Denver for $10 million (Art. 2) and the remaining 50% that would be “leased” to Denver (Art. 3.1) but also subject to potential sale to third parties depending on the outcome of a “Visioning / Master Plan” process (Art. 7). The proposed contract provided that Clayton would take the lead on the “Visioning / Master Plan” process to determine how much of the golf course could be developed and how dense that development could be (Art. 4.1), while also providing up to $350,000 in reimbursement to Clayton for the cost of those planning services (Art. 8.1) and also the proposed contract provided that Clayton would receive 75% of proceeds from the sale of golf course land to third parties (Art. 7.4), with the requirement that all such sales be “consistent” with the master plan to be crafted by Clayton and at the then-appraised market value (Art. 7.2 and 7.3)
2017 – INC Delegation brings forward a second resolution calling for City Council
(1) to amend the proposed contract between Denver and Clayton regarding Park Hill Golf Course so as to remove Clayton from being the lead on the “Visioning / Master Plan” process, and to delete from the proposed contract reimbursement to Clayton for any participation it might choose to undertake in the planning process; and
(2) to commit to the preservation of the Park Hill Golf Course property as park land and open space.
2017 – Denver suspends Golf course deal due to unresolved lease issue.
2018 – Denver City Council votes to approve condemnation to acquire 90 acres for the Platte to Parkhill detention project
I have a memorial bench for my late husband at ParkHill, what would happen to that if there was redevelopment?
I will make sure that it is returned to you or we can find a new suitable to hold his memory.
How can we get involved if we can’t make t to the meeting?
Thanks for your interest. We have just now added a email sign up list. Please share with us your email http://eepurl.com/dnjSUP/ . Information will come from parksandrec@denverinc.org
As I have expressed to the owners of the land on which Park Hill golf course now sits, I am Extremely concerned about the (near) future of this property – especially the section that is furthest west – along Colorado between 40th & 35th avenues & east to about where the golf course ‘driving range’ begins, or about half way inbetween it’s western most & eastern most boundaries. I am a Close neighbor of this land & have been fortunate to have been able to enjoy it & it’s mountain range views for the past several years! It had recently been explained to me by a representative @ Clayton Early Learning that this land – or a majority of it – especially on the west side Would be preserved as free ‘open space’ or community use land that would Not be developed! This was her understanding as, at the time, as the city of Denver was still buying it for ‘limited development.’ There is Critically Less & Less free & open spaces – let alone those available for public recreation left Anywhere in Denver Every Day!! It has to Stop somewhere so that people don’t just ‘live in denver’, we can actually Enjoy Living while we’re living & paying taxes in denver! And the intent of this land long ago Was to be of ‘Benefit to the Community’ (i.e.Neighbors!!) & not Greedy, Bloodthirsty developers anxious to take one of the very last few beautiful, unspoiled, Undeveloped parcels of land in or near this city!! This land is a gem & is truely worth more than just the space it occupies or it’s location! And I was told (by rep @ Clayton) that Even the City of Denver has determined this property to be unfit to develop for building on –
due to it’s need to head off flooding in & around this whole area! I do believe that the people who I have spoken with about this @ Clayton School really Do care not only about the monetary value of the land but it’ even more & longer lasting value to the Park Hill neighboorhoods, & the whole city as open space – useable & enjoyable to all! I am Anxious for any updates on this as soon as they are available!! 303-944-0115.